User Tools

Site Tools


doc:en:copy_paste

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
doc:en:copy_paste [2016/04/21 14:33]
srosmord [Format choice]
doc:en:copy_paste [2016/10/12 14:14] (current)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
   * RTF : probably the most versatile choice for now. Works (almost) everywhere and give reasonable results, especially for hieroglyphs mixed with alphabetic text. Used to be problematic with some versions of Word on Mac, but has recently (2016) improved.   * RTF : probably the most versatile choice for now. Works (almost) everywhere and give reasonable results, especially for hieroglyphs mixed with alphabetic text. Used to be problematic with some versions of Word on Mac, but has recently (2016) improved.
-  * PDF : currently the most acurate ​choice. As far as I know, only Mac OS X supports PDF cut and paste, and few softwares understand it. For instance, Word 2004 doesn'​t. Word 2008 does, however. Textedit has the bad idea of accepting the PDF cut and paste, but transforming the result into a bitmap.+  * PDF : currently the most accurate ​choice. As far as I know, only Mac OS X supports PDF cut and paste, and few softwares understand it. For instance, Word 2004 doesn'​t. Word 2008 does, however. Textedit has the bad idea of accepting the PDF cut and paste, but transforming the result into a bitmap.
   * bitmap : gives a (currently) low resolution bitmap, suitable for web pages for instance.   * bitmap : gives a (currently) low resolution bitmap, suitable for web pages for instance.
   * plain text : will copy the //Manuel de Codage// encoding to the clipboard.   * plain text : will copy the //Manuel de Codage// encoding to the clipboard.
doc/en/copy_paste.txt ยท Last modified: 2016/10/12 14:14 (external edit)